5/18/2023 0 Comments Oversight board theverge![]() This came up recently when the editor shared a private email she received about the number of non-nurse, interprofessional authors in the journal. For example, one member recommended shortening the stated turnaround time for reviewers, suggesting that people wait until the reminder email is sent out-so, give them less time and send out the reminder sooner! We have also discussed letters received by the editor, with responses crafted by the Editorial Advisory Board. At the face-to-face meeting, there was lively discussion and lots of great ideas and advice were generated. The in-person meeting agenda included issues arising throughout the year, such as recruitment and retention of reviewers, the frequency of declined review invitations, and the response time for requested reviews. It was 4–5 hours in length and included a meal and snacks. Prior to June 2020, the third meeting of the year was in-person and scheduled during the annual conference. 2 Considering that, this series of meetings were scheduled at 9 am, Pacific time. Editorial board members are in Europe, Africa and across the United States so we had to be mindful of time zones across the world. For 10 years (from 2010 to spring 2020), these meetings were held online, using the National Association of School Nurses subscription to GoToMeeting. To facilitate the participation of all members, two meetings times are scheduled, thus the editor conducts two award meetings. The ratings are discussed at the meeting and the award decisions are finalized. To prepare for this meeting, members rate the nominated authors' work using specific criteria. Another hour-long meeting is scheduled to select winners of the writing awards. For example, the first meeting (one hour in length) is introductory and serves as an orientation to the role of members. The Journal of School Nursing Editorial Advisory Board and Editorial Panel meetings are held throughout the year and have several purposes. Consider: What is the purpose of the meeting and the expected outcomes? How do participants rate the meeting? JOURNAL OF SCHOOL NURSING EXPERIENCE 1 That evaluation provides some direction for editorial board advisory board meeting assessments for editors. There was some dissatisfaction with the use of technology among in place students-they reported it was bothersome to be required to introduce themselves before speaking. They reported that the pace of the teleconference class needed to be slower to allow ample time for discussion. Students reported satisfaction with the content of the class and the format of a short presentation followed by discussion. The experience with teleconferencing among learners in place and at a distance revealed a few issues. ![]() The assessment and adoption of new school nursing strategies were evaluated and revealed that the strategies were adopted similarly among students regardless of the mode of content delivery. The study of the teleconference program preceded an online program. The class protocol included speakers introducing themselves before speaking in the discussion with the intent to become familiar with all class members. The class began with an introduction and presentation from faculty, followed by discussion. The syllabus contained a weekly study guide with topical content, reading material, and objectives for the week. Students were in place at the university and at a distance across the state. 1 The study reported on the uptake of course program objectives and the use of a teleconference strategy. The discussion was reminiscent of a distance school nursing education program study published years ago using teleconferencing. A recent discussion on the International Academy of Nursing Editors (INANE) email update list revealed editors' experiences with virtual meetings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |